AN INSIDE LOOK
By Bill Gouveia
So
yours truly decided to write about how the “casino effect” is still hovering
over Foxboro and influencing local elections.
The plan was to describe how emotions and political alliances formed
during the casino war had spilled heavily over into election politics and were
affecting the town’s choice of leaders.
But
when sitting down to write such a piece, one problem quickly became
evident: The facts do not support such a
conclusion, despite appearances to the contrary.
But
an objective and quick analysis of Foxboro election history shows that with the
exception of the hugely controversial 2012 affair, voters are simply handling
their business as usual. In fact, their
turnout at local elections puts many of their neighboring communities to shame.
In 2012 the casino issue drove Foxboro’s voter turnout to an incredible 6200. Then look at this year and the turnout of 3200 or close to 30 percent, and compare it to the 1800 folks who voted in 2011. That would lead you to believe the spike in voting is casino-related.
But
in 2010 almost 2900 Foxboro voters cast ballots. In 2009 the vote was over 2600, and it was
close to the same in 2008. Those are turnouts
all hovering around the 25 percent mark, which you might initially think is not
all that great.
Then
you look at turnout percentages in nearby communities like Norton, Mansfield
and North Attleboro where the average has been closer to ten percent in recent
years. Suddenly Foxboro’s numbers don’t
look that bad. In fact, they look pretty
good.
There
are lots of reasons why, starting with the fact there have been races for most
key offices each year. Strongly
contested races generate turnout, while a lack of candidates usually translates
directly into a lack of interest among voters.
Foxboro is fortunate to have had interesting and strong candidates for
their elected positions.
Additionally,
Foxboro has some unique and interesting issues for voters to help decide. Most communities don’t find themselves
dealing regularly with one of the most successful sports franchises in the
country, complete with all the complications, advantages and problems
attached. Citizens tend to be a tad more
selective in choosing who they send to perform such tasks.
Also,
Foxboro citizens are more involved in local government these days than most of
their neighbors. Civic pride is not just
a catchphrase to them. The
self-proclaimed “Gem of Norfolk County” has a bit of a well-deserved
attitude. Voters there do more than talk
the talk – the walk into the polls and vote.
And that is to their everlasting credit.
Watching
the politics of Foxboro over the last five years or so is a fascinating
study. There was a move towards more of
an “outsider” group on the board of selectmen for a while, and the balance of
power in town swung to them. Then the
“townie” faction seemed to stage a mini-revolution, and in a bloodless coup
restored their control. The candidates
who lost this year were no doubt affected by the casino aftermath, but not as
much as some would portray.
Through
it all, Foxboro voters have expressed themselves and then often changed their
minds. Things got a little confusing
with the casino, because “listening” became the big issue. Some wanted to listen to the casino people,
learn the facts and let the voters decide.
Others demanded town officials listen only to them. Selectmen were rewarded or punished for
listening – or not listening. Hey,
nobody said politics had to make sense.
So
does the casino issue still have lingering effects in Foxboro? Sure, but not as much as people might
initially believe - especially those pesky newspaper columnists.
Bill Gouveia is a local columnist and
can be emailed at aninsidelook@aol.com and followed on Twitter at
@Billinsidelook.
No comments:
Post a Comment