Friday, November 20, 2015

Refugee Situation True Test For America

GOUVEIA: Have they no shame?

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size
Posted: Thursday, November 19, 2015 10:38 pm

Governor Baker — shame on you. Shame on you and other governors participating in the effort to ignore thousands of refugees — men, women and children facing death with nowhere to run. All based upon little more than their religion, heritage, and your own politics and fears.
Congratulations to governors in states like Rhode Island and Connecticut who refuse to set aside the principles upon which this country was founded. It is sad when simply doing your job is so unusual it becomes deserving of special attention and praise.

Nowhere are governors given the right to determine who can live in their state. They can flex their political muscles all they want, but they are politicking instead of leading.
Hundreds of thousands of Syrians are running for their lives. Staying in their homeland is an option only if they wish to die. Saying they are desperate is a tremendous understatement.
Yet here, many leaders — and I use that term loosely — are actively seeking to deny them refuge. They claim the reason is security. They believe some radical Islamic terrorists are using the refugee crisis to sneak agents into the United States to attack us on our homeland. And undoubtedly, some are.
They are not swayed by the fact the screening process today is the toughest it has ever been. They ignore that it takes 18 to 24 months of scrutiny before a refugee is allowed to move about freely in the United States. No, they are just focused on protecting their people.
Yeah, right.
Long before the terrible attacks in Paris, conservative leaders and citizens were fighting the potential arrival of Syrian refugees. Their primary fear is not of being attacked, but of poor foreigners moving into their communities and possibly adding to their social welfare budgets. They believe Muslims pose a threat to Christians — and that’s who this country belongs to, right?
Hold a fundraiser for these poor souls and Americans will gladly give. We’ll send a check, make a donation, feed a family for a month. We are generous that way.
But, let them come here? And possibly live among us? Maybe even next door? Whoa, that wasn’t part of the deal. Not in the America some see today.
This is a dangerous world in which we live. Terrorism is a real and serious threat. We must take strong steps to protect our security and freedom.
More than ever, we must ensure our vetting process is stronger and more stringent than before. On that, there is no argument.
But in order to protect America, must we stop being America? Do we have to abandon the principles upon which this country was founded in order to preserve it? Must we become the enemy to defeat the enemy?
On social media, you often see this popular analogy for the refugee crisis: “If you had a bag of 100 apples and you knew five were poisoned, would you eat any of the apples?”
The reply to that is this: “If you saw a boat sinking with 100 children on it, and you knew five were suicide bombers, would you let the other 95 children sink and die?”
When Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh killed 168 people and wounded 680 others on April 19, 1995, did we stop letting white Christians into the country?
“We should be spending money on our veterans, not refugees”, some loudly proclaim. But ignoring these refugees and allowing them to die will not result in one penny more for veterans — and those making these statements know that. Using brave veterans as pawns in a political battle is disgusting.
The Statue of Liberty has these words mounted upon it: “Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore ...”
That is now considered by many to be outdated, given modern day realities.
Yet the words, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” is held as absolute, despite the complete change in weaponry since they were written.
This is the same sort of flawed, fear-driven philosophy that put Japanese-Americans into internment camps.
Here’s hoping our fear and prejudice does not keep us, as a country, from doing the right thing.
Bill Gouveia is a local columnist and longtime local official. He can be emailed at aninsidelook@aol.com and followed on Twitter at @Billinsidelook.

Monday, November 16, 2015

Friday the 13th - the Local View

GOUVEIA: Very superstitious, writing on the wall

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size
Posted: Sunday, November 15, 2015 10:25 pm | Updated: 11:16 pm, Sun Nov 15, 2015.
This past weekend included Friday the 13th. That is the day tradition tells us is bad luck. It is when our superstitions and darkest fears rise to the surface, threatening to bring us down and strip us of good fortune.
That is, if you believe in that kind of stuff.
But even the most non-superstitious tread carefully around the 13th day of the month when it happens to fall on a Friday. After all, it’s one thing not to believe in bad luck. It’s yet another to unnecessarily tempt fate.
Since this space is often dedicated to the goings-on of local government in the various Sun Chronicle communities, it seemed like a good idea to remain in that mode through that dark date. So your intrepid columnist endeavored to find out just what it is local officials are most afraid of on Friday the 13th.
This required extensive research and much courage to look Triskaidekaphobia squarely in the eye without blinking. Our experienced staff of one cast aside all horseshoes, four-leaf clovers and other weapons of the weak. After exhaustive investigation, we have uncovered what was previously secret.
So, tongue once again firmly planted in cheek, here are the things town boards and officials fear most on Friday the 13th.
The Norton Planning Board is deathly afraid someone will try and open a store that sells drive-thru windows for other stores. Of course, those store owners will have to walk in to buy one because the board would deny the drive-thru store a permit for a drive-thru.
The Foxboro Board of Selectmen is secretly afraid they will be chased through town by a giant slice of Kraft cheese with a pair of dice in one hand and a bag of medical marijuana in the other.
Seekonk Town Administrator Shawn Cadime has a Friday the 13th nightmare. In it he wakes up and discovers he’s still in Seekonk and is running out of other jobs or elected positions to seek.
Mansfield Selectman Olivier Kozlowski breaks into a cold sweat because of his Friday the 13th fear. He’s in a Lowe’s store trying to shop, but all the signs are in English and Kozlowski discovers he can now only read Spanish.
Plainville officials were very wary last Friday. When you are home to the only casino in the state, you want to make sure you don’t alienate Lady Luck in any way. In Plainville’s nightmare, Foxboro selectmen win a giant jackpot and drain Plainridge of all resources, then make the Splitsville bowling alley/bar move there.
State representatives are not immune to this irrational fear of Friday the 13th. Rep. Jay Barrows, R-Mansfield, dreams of women suddenly complaining to him about making less than men while doing the same jobs. Rep. Betty Poirier, R-North Attleboro, is terrified out-of-town lawmakers might sneak into her district without her permission. And Rep. Paul Heroux, D-Attleboro, is afraid voters will finally figure out he is a Democrat.
Attleboro has also been affected by this phenomena. Mayor Dumas reportedly had a fear Friday the 13th would somehow yield an opponent who posed an actual threat. The city council shudders over the fear of councilors flipping each other off during public meetings, and of gates opening and closing without control all over the city.
And of course, North Attleboro also has some irrational fears about Friday the 13th. The town’s Representative Town Meeting seems to be considering making voters cast ballots at least 13 times before they listen to them on the matter of government reform. In the same vein, North Attleboro selectmen try not to stick to a plan on the town budget for more than 13 minutes.
So what about the columnist, you ask? What are his peculiar Friday the 13th issues?
I’m constantly afraid I am 13 words over my column limit. I never open the 13th email I get on any particular piece. And I try not to mention my oldest grandson is named William more than 13 times in any given article.
Ok, it’s 13 minutes to deadline. I’m going to walk around my desk 13 times now before sending this in. And for the record — the next Friday the 13th is in May.
Let the preparations begin.
Bill Gouveia is a local columnist and longtime local official. He can be emailed at aninsidelook@aol.com and followed on Twitter at @Billinsidelook.

Friday, November 13, 2015

Foxboro's Burden Nice Problem To Have

GOUVEIA: Bearing ‘burden’ of the Patriots

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size
Posted: Thursday, November 12, 2015 10:27 pm | Updated: 11:12 pm, Thu Nov 12, 2015.
It was more than 40 years ago that the small community of Foxboro held one of its largest town meetings ever and overwhelmingly welcomed the New England Patriots to town.
They did so for a variety of reasons, but the main one was that it was a lucrative deal. It took a site along Route 1 generating little in revenue and turned it into a cash cow that has grown far beyond what anyone could have dreamed of back in the days of Billy Sullivan and Schaeffer Stadium.
Gillette Stadium does not pay property taxes, but rather a surcharge on every ticket sold for nearly every event. This was the agreement the team and town made from the very beginning.
In fiscal year 2014, the stadium paid $2.83 million for ticket sales, alone. That was an increase of more than $500,000 over the previous year, and the highest total ever.
In addition, Foxboro now collects a meals tax which generated large revenues at the stadium, not to mention the huge commercial development the stadium has spurred, with Patriot Place as the centerpiece. The property taxes, the jobs, the fees — it has all kept Foxboro’s finances among the best and most solvent in the area.
Yet despite this, Foxboro selectmen continue to treat the local NFL franchise operation like it is some tremendous burden, rather than the economic engine that has driven Foxboro to be a place where taxpayers can live affordably.
Of course, hosting the Patriots has had some negative impacts, as well. After all, nothing is free. There have been traffic concerns, infringement into residential neighborhoods and claims that small local businesses have been damaged.
Now, selectmen are trying to force the Kraft organization to negotiate over what they term “lost revenue.” Specifically, they are complaining the Patriots removed 1,500 end zone seats to create a new lounge for season ticketholders.
According to town officials, that has resulted in a “loss” of about $30,000 per year in ticket fees.
Perhaps the selectmen just don’t understand marketing and business.
The Patriots aren’t trying to avoid ticket fees, they are trying to maximize revenues and keep drawing fans. Those fans spend money at the stadium and provide revenue to the state and town via meals and sales taxes. They patronize local restaurants. They shop in local stores.
If they don’t do these things, they may not be able to continue to put a competitive product on the field. That means fewer fans in the seats. Fewer fans means less ticket fees.
If the Patriots suddenly were only drawing 30,000 people per game, instead of 63,000 (anyone remember those ’70s and ’80s days?), Foxboro would really have a revenue problem.
So, why do Foxboro officials feel this constant need to bite the hand that feeds them?
No one thinks Foxboro should just roll over for everything the Kraft family wants. The town needs to be vigilant about protecting its own interests.
Selectmen were right last year when they ended the practice of waiving the ticket fee for MIAA playoffs. That responsibility properly rested with the stadium owners, and that was a common-sense change.
There are some who believe the Krafts and the Patriots receive preferential treatment. They argue this is wrong and unfair.
Yet, they have no problem expecting a lot in return.
When Bob Kraft wanted to merely discuss the possibility of building a resort casino, the selectmen refused to extend him the courtesy of even listening. Now, when he makes decisions on how to run his own business, they want to renegotiate his lease.
Maybe some board members believe acting tough toward the Patriots makes them look strong. Maybe they think political grandstanding is good policy.
But if Foxboro officials continue the pattern of antagonistic behavior towards the Kraft organization they have displayed in recent years, they might just discover that money can leave town just as quickly as it comes in.
And, that is bad for everyone in Foxboro.
Town officials should stop being penny-wise and pound-foolish. Being tough negotiators is admirable, but so is looking at the big picture.
Treat the Kraft organization just like you would treat any other business generating millions of dollars annually for your community.
Respect is a two-way street.
Bill Gouveia is a local columnist and longtime local official. He can be emailed at aninsidelook@aol.com and followed on Twitter at @Billinsidelook.